Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts

Monday, 12 September 2016

The Elevator Pitch

www.flickr.com
I've heard this a couple of times, but I can't for the life of me remember exactly where I was at the time. I want to say the story has something to do with Richard Branson, but I could be just making that up.

The ‘elevator pitch’ is how you would explain your rèason d’etré to that critical person you just happen to be sharing an elevator with. And normally in an elevator, you have around thirty seconds or so to do it.

So I have attempted to write out my elevator pitch. How I would explain what I want to achieve in thirty seconds:

Schools don't work for so many people. Many of the most successful people are successful despite their schooling, not because of it. The current trend of standardisation and testing is making things worse. It's narrowing the opportunity for children to find out what they are good at. It's pointless and wasting our human potential.

Instead, I want to shift the focus to a creative, exploratory and innovative experience for students. Allowing them opportunities to find out where their strengths lie, and to follow their passions. Empower students to make a real difference to their world.

I am doing this by disrupting frenetic exam results chasing ‘schooling’ in a positive way. Giving teachers and students the support, opportunity and permission to try different things, to celebrate creative thinking, ingenuity and exploring passions. Join me.

Ok, so I timed myself, it was 33 seconds, and will have to do. This is my current thinking, in 6 months I will possibly have shifted focus, bt at the moment this sums up what I am aiming for.

What’s your 30 second elevator pitch?

Monday, 13 June 2016

Why results can't be used to measure teachers and students

Yes, it’s true, using the exam results that students achieve as a measure of the abilities or qualities of students and teachers, is impossible and a complete contradiction. It amazes me that anybody still thinks you can.


As Graham Nutthall points out in his intriguing summary of his life’s worth of studies called ‘The Hidden Lives of Learners’ (thanks to @MrDMJWalsh for the tip-off), you can’t do it.


Let me explain why:
Measuring teachers through results.
If good results mean the teachers are good, then universities, parents or anyone else can’t use exam results as a measure of the students’ abilities, as it wasn’t their abilities that led to the good results. It was the result of the good teachers they were lucky enough to have.


Measuring students through results.
If good exam results are as a result of the students being good, then they can’t be used to measure teachers by, as it is a reflection of the students they were lucky enough to be teaching. Not their own teaching ability that led to the favourable results.




Of course, I can’t imagine that anybody would argue that results are solely down to just the teachers, or just the students. But the performance of one group affects the results the other is measured on. This performance is a factor that is largely, or completely, out of their control. As I said, it amazes me. It is madness.


Even so, every education system I’ve ever comes into contact with does it. Remember, most assessments are incredibly narrow. Most measure academic ability or intelligences without exploring the other skills and attributes students may have been developing.
But if the focus of assessments is narrow, and the results of the assessments are high stakes enough, for the teacher and student there are huge temptations.


Stories of students trying to cheat have rarely been in short supply. But as Levitt and Dubner illustrate in ‘Freakonomics’, the pressure can get to teachers too. They managed to prove beyond doubt that some teachers had been cheating by changing students’ answers on test papers. They could do this by applying economic data analysis tools to discover unusual answering patterns on test papers. But, there are far more subtle ways that high stakes testing changes learning in schools. And they may even be more damaging.


‘Teaching to the test’ becomes irresistible as more and more pressure is piled on to get results. This must surely be to the detriment of the wider learning of the students?


Weekend exam revision sessions and extra tutoring in the evenings crams students’ heads with stuff to be vomited up through their pen onto test papers, before being quickly forgotten. And what life experiences are the students missing out on while doing all this extra exam preparation? What is the measure of the impact of not doing their sports, socialising, sleeping enough or relaxing? Nobody seems to care.




So it is time to accept that you can’t measure students and teachers on results. I think you can’t measure people’s abilities on something they don’t have control over, it’s nonesense. And placing huge pressure by making them high stakes is detrimental to students and teachers. Time to find something different.


Any ideas?

Wednesday, 15 April 2015

4 ways to deal with 'Content Explosion'


From when I was young, I remember a conversation between my Dad and my Uncle Keith. Uncle Keith worked for the navy in a job which involved the use of computers in their early form. Dad was pointing out how easy these computers must make it for Keith to do his job these days, and in response Keith just sighed and shook his head sadly,
"Naaaa, not really, all that happens now is that I'm given even more to do, and expected to do it better and faster."

This is the crux of my 'content explosion theory'. In my day at school, producing a project of some sort would require quite a bit of handwriting, drawing, colouring, cutting and sticking. All this is time consuming to a left-handed ponderous worker like myself. The resulting masterpiece would be handed in and marked by my long suffering teachers. This process was likely to take a couple of days, a week or even longer. Therefore the balance of work produced to work returned marked, was relatively easy to maintain for my teachers.
Spring forward to my internet, iPad and 1 to 1 enabled classroom and it doesn't quite work like that anymore. Were I to let them, my students could produce one of those type of projects every day, 'internet' researched. Including professional looking graphics and a decent amount of design awareness.
Similarly my students can produce extended pieces of writing, shoot and edit films, create an Explain Everything to er... explain something and more. This volume of material just keeps coming forth, mounting up like European wheat waiting to be consumed by an overnourished and time-poor populace. Pearson refer to the ‘Digital Ocean’ in regards to data on students, but this is also a mass of content that is growing daily, not just data, and it is all out there.

This became a real problem in the early days of the 1 to 1 roll out in my class. The students were on a creation frenzy, encouraged by me to choose their own method of demonstrating their learning, they began creating piles and gigabytes of 'stuff'. Stuff that there was never any chance that I was going to have enough waking hours to consume, mark and feedback on. I caught myself contemplating what I could do to 'slow them down' but soon realised this was not the kind of place I wanted to be in. Slowing down students who were desperate to create was the antithesis of what I was after.

So I came up with a few techniques I have begged, borrowed and stolen from wherever I could to turn this opportunity into a much deeper and more powerful learning experience. These are things that good learning and teaching has always needed, but become particularly relevant in the creative 1 to 1 environment:

1. Focus heavily on the audience.
For each piece of learning where my students will be creating something to demonstrate their understanding, I give them an audience. Peers from elsewhere in the world or younger/older children from my own school have worked well. Parents and other adult audiences can be used effectively too. This focuses the students on how their work will appeal to the chosen audience, and consider the needs of that audience when assembling their pieces. For example, my Y5 maths group created iBooks to teach Y2 children all about shapes. They also designed a lesson, with activities, to teach Y3 students about how to stay safe when using the internet. Getting them to teach the lesson was a huge learning experience.

openclipart.org
2. Focus on the process.
How are they going to achieve what they need to? What do they need to know? How can they present what they know? Which methods will be most effective? As they are working, how can they check that their approach is working? A colleague and I are developing a template proforma with guiding questions to facilitate these kind of questioning activities and to develop a process based approach to learning tasks.

3. Focus on the quality of the end product.
Now there are better tools for the job, the job needs to be completed to a higher standard. This will generally still be reflected in the amount of time students spend on creative projects. If it is quick and easy to do, has it been done well enough? For example, authoring an iBook is a task that can be done very quickly, but usually a much better end product will result from taking time to draft and redraft the text, create the artwork and carefully design the layout for maximum effect. During this process is where you as a teacher can use timely feedback/advice to guide and influence the learners towards improvement. If you want to know more about assessing learning at a deeper level, check out some great thinking here, at Mindshift.


4. Do something 'real' with it.
Although I am probably more interested in the process the students have gone through, than the end product. It is still something that needs to be valued. Follow through with the audience anyway you can think of. Skype, exhibitions, sharing times, blogs, film shows, exit point events, teaching a lesson and publishing a book are just some of the ways. Remember, a truly good audience will be able to give some kind of feedback, and enable the students to reflect on how successful they were this time.

Is everything I do with my students set up like this? No, it's not. But I do connect the other learning tasks we do to the overall end products, so students can see the reasons for each task, and how it leads into their wider learning.